Wikipedia reliable source.

View _711548.docx from COMMUNICAT UCU 100 at Kenyatta University. Surname 1 Student's Name Professor's Name Course Date Digital Media Wikipedia d.Since the internet itself -- the source of all of Google's results -- includes all sorts of misinformation, one cannot be certain that results returned from Google are absolutely reliable. Google is fine for our everyday use: In everyday life, we often use Google to find generally agreed upon facts about a topic.Wikipedia is an excellent place to go for information, but many researchers don’t feel comfortable citing it as a resource due to its open contribution model - in other words, anyone can edit Wikipedia. They just don't feel that Wikipedia is a reliable source of information, whereas a source like Britannica is, generally, more reliable.If the website or page to which you want to link includes information that is not yet a part of the article, consider using it as a source for the article, and citing it. Guidelines for sourcing, which include external links used as citations, are discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources.

If there's an outside and reliable source documenting his view, sure. The website could be acceptable (but unnecessary given that we have the book) as an additional source to prove the quote is indeed him, but neither the website nor his book are reliable for whether his views are due weight, since his other books (particularly his advocacy of the Mosaic …Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created by the Wikimedia Foundation. Like other encyclopedias, Wikipedia can provide valuable information about certain topics. However, unlike encyclopedias, Wikipedia pages can be edited by anyone, which means that sometimes the information stated is not reliable and is edited for the sake of making a …

Since 2018 Facebook has used Wikipedia to provide information buttons with the sources of news articles. ... embarrassments—and its own disclaimer that “Wikipedia is not a reliable source ...Definition. Fake news sites deliberately publish hoaxes and disinformation to drive web traffic inflamed by social media. These sites are distinguished from news satire (which is usually intended to be humorous) as they mislead and sometimes profit from readers' gullibility. While most fake news sites are portrayed to be spinoffs of other news sites, …

Here is the source (without the video): Williams, Nathan (2002-11-26) Homeopathy: The Test, Horizon (BBC) Retrieved on 2007-01-26 ; youtube is probably not the best reference, but the BBC is per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Science article in the popular press. Table Manners C·U·T 08:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Hi there TableManners.9 mar 2012 ... Most of us, who recently graduated from uni, praised Wikipedia for its precious service during our uni carrer, especially when time was ...Summarize how actions and achievements are characterized by reliable sources without giving undue weight to recent events. Do not label people with contentious labels, loaded language, or terms that lack precision, unless a person is commonly described that way in reliable sources. Instead use clear, direct language and let facts alone do the ...Biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources, and must accurately reflect current knowledge.This guideline supports the general sourcing policy with specific attention to what is appropriate for medical content in any Wikipedia article, including those on alternative medicine.

For more than 200 years, HMS has been the most prestigious and trusted source of medical education in the world. The Harvard Medical School name is synonymous with best-in-class learning, clinical excellence and innovative biomedical research—an assurance that the knowledge imparted creates transformational impact. Our Library.

Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file

The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8±1.5% (p<0.001).”. They concluded that “Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education.”. It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people ...Apr 3, 2013 · In theory, Wikipedia is closer to being reliable than it is anything else. Of course, you are always bound to come upon an entry that is un-sourced and is clearly spouting lies, but the benefit of Wikipedia is that that kind of information can be deleted with relative quickness. With any print publications, errors are only made known when the ... Prove Wikipedia:Reliable sources or source of the source--Brazil4Linux 13:39, 1 December 2005 (UTC) Reply Protected. The page is protected until this dispute is resolved. — BRIAN 0918 • 2005-12-2 14:46. In particular, lot of POV and non-reliable sources about SCEI losses are being inserting by User:GoldDragon with the link of redhirring, but …The definition of a credible source can change depending on the discipline, but in general, for academic writing, a credible source is one that is unbiased and is backed up with evidence. When writing a research paper, always use and cite credible sources. ... (.gov or .mil) - Government or military websites end in .gov or .mil, and in general are …Wikipedia's guideline on Reliable sources states that "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Wikipedia's guideline on Notability states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to ...

At least three independent editors have reviewed the sources listed above and found them to not be reliable.Additionally, many editors have reviewed the sources in the article, especially the Casper Star Tribune article and found them to be reliable.Wikipedia is a private website, you have no right to free speech.If you legitimately believe that you are …At ThoughtCo, we believe that great inspiration begins with a question, and we help 13 million users answer theirs every month. Whether yours is about science and math, humanities and religion, or architecture and the arts, our in-depth articles, written by literature writers, Ph.D.s, and experienced instructors, are designed to give you the …24 jul 2020 ... The Wikipedia community recently engaged in a spirited debate over whether Fox News is a reliable enough source to use as a citation in ...A More Reliable Wikipedia Could Come from AI Research Assistants A neural network can identify Wikipedia references that are unlikely to support an article's claims—and scour the web for...The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard. Wikipedia's information is reliable not because it uses a single "authoritative" source as a reference, but rather because it is a collection of references that represents the accepted knowledge of the academic world.You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people. These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is impossible to fully cover here. You can find more information at Wikipedia:Verifiability and at Wikipedia:Reliable sources.

9 mar 2012 ... Most of us, who recently graduated from uni, praised Wikipedia for its precious service during our uni carrer, especially when time was ...The system, called SIDE, was created by Fabio Petroni and his colleagues at Samaya AI, a London-based company. It was described in a study published in Nature Machine Intelligence on October 19....

Because Wikipedia cannot be considered a reliable source, the use of Wikipedia is not accepted in many schools and universities in writing a formal paper, and some educational institutions have banned it as a primary source while others have limited its use to only a pointer to external sources. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement. A source can only be considered reliable when the source's qualities are compared against the qualities editors ... JSTOR. JSTOR is an online library of all kinds of sources, such as books, articles, and journals. Even though access is limited, it can be a great help for students. It is also considered one of the most …Yet, because anyone can write a Wikipedia entry, it’s often highly stigmatized in academic communities. This latest study, however, shows that if consumed carefully, Wikipedia can be a legitimate resource. “The first step is admitting that everyone, from students to doctors, uses Wikipedia,” writes Jake Orlowitz, the head of The Wikipedia ...TheCollector is a community for scholars, classrooms, and enthusiasts. We broaden our audience's understanding of the humanities through articles and discoveries from ancient history to the modern era. Our interests include ancient through modern philosophy, renaissance paintings to modern sculptures, conquerors, conceptual art, and more. We ...Dependence solely on Wikipedia for information can be a risky endeavour and highlights the importance of cross-referencing with the original sources provided in …

Wikipedia reliable source guides‎ (1 C, 4 P) E. Wikipedia essays about reliable sources‎ (37 P) L. WikiProject lists of reliable sources‎ (36 P) W. Wikipedia perennial sources‎ (12 P) Pages in category "Wikipedia reliable sources" The following 6 pages are in this category, out of 6 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. ...

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia—that is, a comprehensive compendium of knowledge. The threshold for inclusion on Wikipedia is whether material is attributable to a reliable published source, not whether it is true. Wikipedia is not the place to publish your opinions, experiences, or arguments. Although everything on Wikipedia must be ...

Take, for example, the one so called "reliable source" that was cited as grounds for calling the project dormant, which is from September 2014. That's a year out of date and completely irrelevant, and absolutely should not be considered to trump a much more recent primary source. Sprhodes 15:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC) ReplyWikipedia claims that “there are concerns regarding whether the documents are genuine or tampered.” In fact, WikiLeaks has a 100 percent track record for publishing accurate documents. This is not disputed by any reliable source. Wikipedia does not consider WikiLeaks to be reliable source, despite its track record of 100 percent accuracyHere is the source (without the video): Williams, Nathan (2002-11-26) Homeopathy: The Test, Horizon (BBC) Retrieved on 2007-01-26 ; youtube is probably not the best reference, but the BBC is per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Science article in the popular press. Table Manners C·U·T 08:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Hi there TableManners.The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard. There is disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source, but most academics agree that you shouldn’t cite it in your writing, for two main reasons: As an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a tertiary source , which means it doesn’t provide original insights or analysis.Print sources (and web-based versions of those sources) tend to be the most reliable. Examples include: books published by major publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals, websites of any of the above, and other websites that meet the same requirements as a reputable print-based source.Aug 26, 2021 · These highly personal and subjective sources are seldom reliable enough to stand on their own in your final research product. Similarly, Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source due to the fact that it can be edited by anyone at any time. However, it can be a good starting point for general information and finding other sources. Are Owen's statistics among those derived from flawed methrdology, and can we find them in a Wikipedia-compliant reliable source somewhere (i.e.; not in an opinion piece, but published in a source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy)? Xenophrenic 00:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Owens is a military historian, and supposedly an expert.

For general information about data, publications and time-series, contact the World Bank Development Data Group: [email protected] Phone: (202) 473-7824 or +1 (800) 590-1906.About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Contribute Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file; Search. Create account; Log in; Personal tools. Create account; Log in; Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Contents move to sidebar hide (Top) 1 Requested move. 5 comments Toggle Requested move …Find sources: "RationalWiki" - news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2019) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) Prior to 2010, RationalWiki's domains were registered to Trent Toulouse, and the wiki was hosted from a server located in his home. [5]Coal is important because it is a reliable and an affordable source of energy in many countries. It is responsible for about 40 percent of the electricity generated in the world. Coal is a crucial ingredient in manufacturing industries.Instagram:https://instagram. baby boy vineyard vinesdnd violetken1cor 6 kjvwhat is a kansas jayhawk Christians trust the reliability of the Bible because we consider it divinely inspired, find historical evidence supporting its claims, and see internal consistency as a …Wikipedia is an encyclopedia—that is, a comprehensive compendium of knowledge. The threshold for inclusion on Wikipedia is whether material is attributable to a reliable published source, not whether it is true. Wikipedia is not the place to publish your opinions, experiences, or arguments. Although everything on Wikipedia must be ... abstracspring break 2023 kansas From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The largest extant species of bird measured by mass is the common ostrich ( Struthio camelus ), closely followed by the Somali ostrich ( Struthio molybdophanes ). ku bill self basketball camp Nov 1, 2021 · Step 2: Make a note of in-text citations given against your points, as well as the list of references at the end of the Wikipedia article. Step 3: Search Google Scholar for these citations using the ‘ author name ’, ‘ date ’ and ‘ title ’ noted from the Wikipedia article. Summarize how actions and achievements are characterized by reliable sources without giving undue weight to recent events. Do not label people with contentious labels, loaded language, or terms that lack precision, unless a person is commonly described that way in reliable sources. Instead use clear, direct language and let facts alone do the ...Yes. But only as a reference. Wikipedia is frowned upon. Not really. What you should do is look at their sources and quote those after reading them. i must be missing something bc encyclopedia britannica is a different thing from wikipedia. once upon a time ppl bought TOMES of fact-books for their homes/kids, and encyclopedia britannica is one ...