Imr 4350 vs h4350.

This is probably a dumb question, but I was wanting to buy some IMR-4350 powder for reloading my .270 with 130 grain bullets. The store didn't have any but had H4350 powder, so I bought a can of that. I was wondering if I could use the same amount (53.5 grains) with 130 grain bullets, as I...May 3, 2009 · Hodgdon H4350 powder CCI LR Mag primers or Rem 9 1/2 LR Mag Primers Sierra 180 Gr. Gameking bullets I also have some IMR 4830 but only a couple pounds. I have a full 8 lbs of 4350 so I would like to find a load using it. Oct 16, 2022 · The 180 Gr is on the heavy side for the 7RM, H-4350 is probably a too fast burning powder for that bullet weight. A more appropriate powder would be IMR-8133, Ramshot Magnum ,even Retumbo. With these slower burning powders make sure your neck tension is set properly, this will help with inconsistent velocity’s, CBTO will also aid a lot. In researching a powder starting point for loads I see H4350 and H4831 mentioned the most. Heres the reason for my question, I have a lot of IMR4350 on hand as its the powder of choice in my 7mm-08 and 260. I know the H4350 is more temp tolerant but wonder if working up a load with the powder I have (IMR4350) would be very similar to the H4350.Last year, top F-Class shooter Rick Jensen did a comparison between H4350 and IMR 4451, shooting the two powder in a wide range of temperatures. His data suggests that both powders show good temp stability. Powder Comparison Test: H4350 vs. IMR 4451 Rick Jensen, Captain of the U.S. F-Open Rifle Team, has tested some of the new IMR 4451 powder.

Have never tried IMR 4350, but I've used a bunch of H4350 with great results. Been trying out RL 17 now and heard a lot about it not having good temp stability. So far I've noticed no difference in point of impact between 95, 60, and 30 degrees. Which these were all at 100 yards, but since 99% of my deer kills are under 100 yards I don't …IMR. IMR 4198 Smokeless Powder 8 Lbs. Rated 5.00 out of 5. $ 245.36. Add to cart. IMR 4350 is the number one choice for the new short magnums, both Remington and Winchester versions. For magnums with light to medium bullet weights..

Hodgdon H4350. Hodgdon H4831. Hodgdon H4895. Hodgdon Hybrid 100V. Hodgdon Varget. ... Improved Military Rifle IMR 4350. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4451. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4831. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4895. Improved Military Rifle IMR 4955. Improved Military Rifle IMR 7828. Improved Military Rifle IMR 7828 SSC. Improved …Hodgdon 4350 vs imr 4895 in 30-06 savage axis. I ran into an issue with 2 loads and am on a hunt for answers. 46gr imr4895 with 165gr nosler ballastic tip. 57gr h4350 with 165 gr hornady sst. After 100 yard zero with hornady sst, i decided to compare the nosler and the nosler hit 5" higher. I know there's a ballistic coefficient difference and ...

Consulting my reloading manuals, it appears that there is typically 0.5gr increase for H4350 over the same velocity for IMR 4350. For example, ...Mar 5, 2020 · ELD 140's and many sub half moa groups to 600 yds - a few at 5/8, very few at 3/4. It was all I used back in the H4350 shortage and really had no complaints. I've since switched to H4350 and RL16 but accuracy and SD's/ES's have stayed about the same. Temp stability is the only gain. IMR4831 is faster (#98) than H4831 and the short cut vers (#101). According to Reloaders Nest, AA4350 is #212, IMR4350 #213 and H4350 #217. IMR 4831 is #225 and H4831 is #232. This data can be confusing sometimes. The various brands (IMR,H,AA) are really close, but not interchangeable. 4831 is definately slower than 4350.Testing Hodgdon H4350 vs IMR 4350 with the 143gr Hornady ELD-X in 6.5 Creedmoor.UPDATED 09/27/2018 - All links have been removed to comply with YouTube conte...

Mar 29, 2010. Fitch. F. Ok so there is COMPLETELY conflicting information all over the internet about RL-17 and whether or not it is temperature stable. They claim it is, and some agree; however, many others do not. Most people who claim it is fairly variable with changing temperature agree that it changes about .8fps...

I first developed my .260 loads with imr-4350, h-4350, rl-17. This is a long range rig so velocity is a factor for me. In the ladder and proceeding group testing at 60* the imr was the most accurate with 140 amax and 140 barnes burners. My accuracy load was 43.5 grains imr-4350 win. 243 brass cci 200 @ 2800+ fps.

22 កញ្ញា 2022 ... ... imr 4350 sportsman's warehouse, imr 4350 temperature sensitivity, imr 4350 temperature stability, imr 4350 uses, imr 4350 vs h4350, imr 4350 vs ...So well, that it is hard to tell the difference. Groups are excellent and I would be very confident in either one. In fact, I had settled on IMR 4350 based on availability but found...In researching a powder starting point for loads I see H4350 and H4831 mentioned the most. Heres the reason for my question, I have a lot of IMR4350 on hand as its the powder of choice in my 7mm-08 and 260. I know the H4350 is more temp tolerant but wonder if working up a load with the powder I have (IMR4350) would be very similar to the H4350.Let’s find out what distinguishes one from the other. IMR 4350 Vs. H4350 IMR 4350 and H4350 are smokeless and slow-burning rifle powders. They’re suitable for use in the sports and firearm industry. Although both gunpowders differ and the usage will depend on the purpose of your shot, you can use IMR4350 as an alternative to H4350.I've been using mostly Accurate 4350.I did a test on all three using same charge and bullet.Accurate 4350 gave me just little tighter group with the best velocity.IMR-4350 was close in velocity with just a little larger group.H-4350 was a bit slower by around 20-30fps slower than the other two and came in second to the Accurate 4350 in group size.May 23, 2017 · Why do you never see a comparison of these 2 powders in a similar burn rate mentioned as a replacement for h4350. Was under the impression that they are a premium powder. Or are they not temperature stable just been thinking about other alternatives with the availability issues of h4350 thanks for any and all input Beast, per published burn rate charts the H4350 is a hair slower than the IMR 4350. The Hodgdon is also an extreme powder which is said to be temperature stable. Because of the temperature stability attribute of H4350 it would be my powder of choice if I had both available to me and had to pick one to work up a load.

H4350. 49.5 gr. A4350, PPU brass, Fed 210 primers and 145 gr. Speer HCs gives 2788 fps from my 23” custom barreled Ruger 1A 7x57 and averages about 1 to 1.25 inches at 100 meters. On the occasional day when “the moon is in the 7th house and Jupiter aligns with Mars”, I can squeeze 3/4” groups out of it.🙄.IMR 4831 or 4350 do well, my go to powder for my 270 is H4350 with a 130 gr. Barnes TTSX. I like the H4350 the best due to the consistent velocity and accuracy over a wide temperature range. Mar 9, 2019 #19 theddguide Member Joined Jan 12, 2019 85 ...Jan 26, 2021 · Shooting Hornady 140 ELDMs, my H4350 load was Hornady case, CCI BR2, 42.5 grains of H4350 giving excellent accuracy and about 2820 fps in a 24" Rock Creek barrel. My IMR 4451 load was the same bullet, case, and primer, 41.8 grains of IMR 4451 giving about 2700 fps and excellent accuracy. Product Details. A stand-out choice for new short magnums, IMR® 4350 powder comes specially designed for use with lightweight or medium-weight bullets. It works superbly with both Remington and Winchester models. Uniformly consistent, this medium- to slow-burn rate propellant delivers enhanced accuracy with every shot.Tx. I noted a 155 f/s drop in velocity. The cartridge was 7.5x55 Swiss . The load was 52gr imr4350 and 165gr Hornady BTSP,2650 f/s 80*F to 2495 f/s 30*F. The poi dropped about 1.5" at 100 yds. The primers were Wlr. Re: Just how Temp Sensitive is IMR 4350. witnessing # 4128723 05/31/10. Joined: Nov 2003.

Two sub .4 moa loads, first load with H4350, 42.1, Hornady brass, federal 210M , and Nosler140 grain Ballistic Tip, coal at 2.768”. Second load identical but with IMR 4350,42.4 gn. Tried IMR 4451, StaBall 6.5, W760, all with several loads each. Could get into .500-.700”, but not sub .5 MOA.

7mm-08 Remington: "You cannot beat 47.0 to 50.0 grains of H-4350 and any bullet around 140 grains in Remington’s little update of the classic 7x57mm Mauser. Some bullets are longer and grabbier so will only take the lighter charge, but Hornady’s 139 grainer will take 50.0 grains.I’m using IMR4350 with great results, 41.6 grains and 143 gr Hornady ELD-X is averaging .56 inch for a 5 shot group at 100 yards. I’m also having good luck with RL16 and 140 gr Speer Gold Dots. Only one 5 shot group but it was under .5 inch. Re: IMR4350 vs H4350 in 6.5 Creedmoor. centershot # 14637182 03/06/20.IMR 4350 is a medium- to slow-burn rate propellant and is the number one choice for the new short magnums, both Remington and Winchester versions. For magnums with light- to medium-bullet weights, IMR 4350 is the best choice. IMR recommends always consulting www.IMRReloading.com for the most accurate, up-to-date data.Location. New Jersey. IMR 4831 or 4350 do well, my go to powder for my 270 is H4350 with a 130 gr. Barnes TTSX. I like the H4350 the best due to the consistent velocity and accuracy over a wide temperature range.The Pennyrile of Kentucky. I finally got around to trying the IMR4350 powder in my 6.5. Loaded up 40 grains with a 120 grain Sierra SP, Hornady brass and a CCI primer. Five shots measured .9 at a 100 yards, very mild shooting load. Then I went up to 41.8 grains, and tried both the Sierra and a 120 Nosler BT.Mar 5, 2020 · ELD 140's and many sub half moa groups to 600 yds - a few at 5/8, very few at 3/4. It was all I used back in the H4350 shortage and really had no complaints. I've since switched to H4350 and RL16 but accuracy and SD's/ES's have stayed about the same. Temp stability is the only gain. Product Overview. IMR 4350 is a medium- to slow-burn rate propellant and is the number one choice for the new short magnums, both Remington and Winchester versions. For magnums with light- to medium-bullet weights, IMR 4350 is the best choice. IMR recommends always consulting www.IMRReloading.com for the most accurate, up-to-date data.Today, we have H4350 (Hodgdon) and AA 4350 (Accurate Arms) available in addition to the IMR version. In this case, the propellant burn rates are much more alike ...The 180 Gr is on the heavy side for the 7RM, H-4350 is probably a too fast burning powder for that bullet weight. A more appropriate powder would be IMR-8133, Ramshot Magnum ,even Retumbo. With these slower burning powders make sure your neck tension is set properly, this will help with inconsistent velocity’s, CBTO will also aid a lot.63 Reaction score 0 Location Fairbanks Alaska Feb 10, 2009 #1 I have been researching the feasability of using H4350 in place of IMR 4350 in some of my reloads. I see that the burn rates etc are almost identical. I would like to hear others thoughts/experiances with using H4350 in place of IMR 4350 B BrownBear New member Joined Apr 25, 2006

5,081 28. Apr 14, 2013 #2. Steve, That powder is intended to duplicate the IMR 4350, so I think you'll find that it will serve you well, at about the same charge level that you were using with the IMR version. Work up from a grain or so below the IMR 4350 level you were using, and search for the accuracy node.

Jan 18, 2005. 46. 0. I've tried both 4350's in November in Alaska and H4350 very definitley has the edge in temperature stability. The rifle in question is a 358 Norma Mag. Max load for IMR 4350 is listed at 74 grains but I can't get that much IMR in the case, even with serious compression, the bullet will back out.

According Nosler's load data, IMR4350 is the most accurate powder for this round, but I've read h4350 has the same burn rate and is virtually interchangeable. Does anybody have any side-by-side experience with these two powders?The Pennyrile of Kentucky. I finally got around to trying the IMR4350 powder in my 6.5. Loaded up 40 grains with a 120 grain Sierra SP, Hornady brass and a CCI primer. Five shots measured .9 at a 100 yards, very mild shooting load. Then I went up to 41.8 grains, and tried both the Sierra and a 120 Nosler BT.The H-4895 is much more versatile and better suited for older cartridges like the ones used in military rifles in both bolt and automatic variety. Plus H-4895 is excellent for reduced loads. H-4350 has a slower burn rate. It's better suited for larger capacity cartridges and some smaller bore cartridges like maybe .243 or 6mm Remington.Sep 23, 2011 · I have several older reloading manuals on hand that list loads for the .308 WIN that use IMR 4350. I would assume that it is possible to use the H variety albeit with an appropriate recipe. So, if the load says 45.0 grains of IMR 4350, what would be the corresponding H load? I'm going to try the H4350 with the 208 AMAX. thanks, Eric. Mar 14, 2019 · Accurate 4350 in it's current form is made in the IMR plant in Canada, and my current load with it for 30-06 and a 190 grains Nosler is 58.8 grains and that is 2% off of where I found pressure. My H4831 load is 59 grains. So it is quite a bit slower than the other 4350's. Posts: 1,753. To summarize what has been said, 4064 and its near twin brother 4895 are mid burning rate powders and more efficient with 150 and 168 bullet weights, while 4350 is a lower burning rate powder and more efficient with the heavier 180 and 200 grain bullets. Note that 47 gr 4895 as well as 4064 are common loadings for the …The 180 Gr is on the heavy side for the 7RM, H-4350 is probably a too fast burning powder for that bullet weight. A more appropriate powder would be IMR-8133, Ramshot Magnum ,even Retumbo. With these slower burning powders make sure your neck tension is set properly, this will help with inconsistent velocity’s, CBTO will also aid a lot.The powders below are listed in the order of their approximate burning rate, from the quickest powder to the slowest. It is important to trust in a top quality manual when reloading. This chart is only for comparison purposes. This page shows a powder burning rate chart. It shows a comparison between Winchester, Hodgdon, IMR, Accurate, Alliant ...Nov 27, 2021 · Hodgdon 4350 vs imr 4895 in 30-06 savage axis. I ran into an issue with 2 loads and am on a hunt for answers. 46gr imr4895 with 165gr nosler ballastic tip. 57gr h4350 with 165 gr hornady sst After 100 yard zero with hornady sst, i decided to compare the nosler and the nosler hit 5" higher. I know there's a ballistic coefficient difference and ...

I am having issues finding H4350 my Lyman manual shows very similar performance with IMR and I think all IMR powders are suppose to have some copper fouling inhibitor in them. So what is the difference does anyone have a history with the IMR powders? Savage 12BVSS Well-Known Member Joined Dec 20, 2019 Messages 1,067 Location Maine Jan 12, 2020 #2Let’s find out what distinguishes one from the other. IMR 4350 Vs. H4350 IMR 4350 and H4350 are smokeless and slow-burning rifle powders. They’re suitable for use in the sports and firearm industry. Although both gunpowders differ and the usage will depend on the purpose of your shot, you can use IMR4350 as an alternative to H4350.A4350 = 48.3 grains IMR 4350 = 50.4 grains H4350 = 49.5 grains Seems to …Instagram:https://instagram. best cavalry bannerlordcassandra davis leaked onlyfansnelson house obituariesgis gaston H 4350 is AR 2209. When first released in the 80's, it was a about 5% faster than IMR 4350. When ADI got the contracts of supply to Hodgdon, it changed the burning rate to slightkly slower than IMR which hurt no-one and made the powder more flexible in a lot of magnums so it was an improved product in the market place.I've been using mostly Accurate 4350.I did a test on all three using same charge and bullet.Accurate 4350 gave me just little tighter group with the best velocity.IMR-4350 was close in velocity with just a little larger group.H-4350 was a bit slower by around 20-30fps slower than the other two and came in second to the Accurate 4350 in group size. soho nails durhamregeneration nashville live stream Let us know, gonna be hard to beat RL16 or h4350 to only save 5-8 bucks a lb. hate to be negative but it would be awesome to have another decent option in the mix, on a hungry gas gun prairie dog slayer I’d like a more economical powder choice ... I'd suspect they tried to clone h4350 as close as possible and when they said old tech they were ... rock pet hypixel In my 7-08 rifles Varget and IMR 4064 have worked out best for me. They are nearly interchangable for load data. (As is Vitavouri N140) I also had good luck with either IMR 4350 or H 4350 with 140 grain bullets. When forced to find a load for a "no lead" bullet here in CA, I wound up using IMR 4064 with the 120 grain Barnes TSX.The Sniper's Hide App is here! Download the app DOWNLOAD. Let me hear your thoughts and experiences please... I have H4350, H4831, and H4831sc. I know H4350 is the preferred from these, but my reloading books all include H4831 or sc for heavier bullets. I just don't hear much love for 4831 in the 06. I'm working up a load for hunting whitetail ...